[gobolinux-devel] Dependencies rework

[Lucas C. Villa Real]

On 8/27/07, hisham.hm at gmail.com <hisham.hm at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Just to make it official, as we've already talked about this before:
> > yes, this seems to be a sane approach to handle dependencies.
> > BuildDependencies, however, should be left untouched, as it's a good
> > source for hints when something goes wrong.
>
> Did you mean BuildInformation, perchance?

Oh, yes, sure. I had the "Dependencies" word in mind when I wrote that :)

-- 
Lucas
powered by /dev/dsp