[gobolinux-users] Re: Gobohide broken on 220.127.116.11?
lijon at kymatica.com
Thu Aug 11 19:58:33 GMT 2005
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:18:05 -0300
Hisham Muhammad <hisham.hm at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/11/05, Jonatan Liljedahl <lijon at kymatica.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:15:28 -0300
> > Hisham Muhammad <hisham.hm at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Another similar issue is the names of binary packages compiled
> > > > for some specific version of another package. Like the
> > > > Perl-XML-parser which is compiled for Perl 5.8.6 and won't work
> > > > with other versions unless you rename the version specific
> > > > dirs... So the package should be named so you know for what Perl
> > > > version it's compiled.
> > >
> > > At first this sounds like a good idea, but OTOH Perl is just a
> > > "strict dependency" for the package (we don't want to start
> > > listing dependency versions in package version numbers :) ). What
> > > we need instead is to be able to specify "Perl == 5.8.6" in the
> > > dependencies file.
> > The problem is
> > /Programs/Perl-XML-Parser/Current/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/
> > IMHO, there could (should) be a Perl-XML-Parser binary package
> > available for each available Perl binary package.
> > I think it should be named
> > Perl-XML-Parser--2.34--5.8.6--i686.tar.bz2 or something...
> That is, if we want to support (as a distro) multiple versions of
> Perl. Do we? Maybe we should just make available the latest Perl and
> have the Perl-XML-Parser package always match it (and indicate a
> strict dependency, so that when the user upgrades one they will know
> they have to upgrade the other).
And the same for Python, Guile, Ruby, GTK, and all other stuff that may
have separate plugin packages?
I'm not so sure. There could be reasons for a user not to use the latest
version of something. There could be an extension that the user needs
badly and which isn't updated for the latest version of "something"
There could be other reasons as well... The user should be free to use
As I see it, the existing Perl-XML-Parser--2.34--i686.tar.bz2 is a
"subpackage" to Perl--5.8.6--i686.tar.bz2, and should be known as such.
Maybe we could have dirs like Perl--5.8.6--SubPackages/ in the package
But that won't work with stuff like D-Bus, which has extensions for a
lot of languages... There is also the situation were a package can be
built with many different configure enable/disable options, Qt support
or not? etc...
As long as all those details are available somehow, at least in the
package itself (in a textfile) or even better extractable trough the net
so the user can now if it's worth downloading the binary package or if
she should go for the source tarball directly!
I'm just thinking here, and I'm sure you all see the problem. I don't
have any solution though... =)
/Jonatan -=( http://kymatica.com )=-
More information about the gobolinux-users