[gobolinux-users] Unionfs to replace sandbox?
kundor at kundor.org
Tue Oct 11 22:40:32 GMT 2005
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 18:06, Bill Burdick wrote:
> Hey, great to see that you guys are thinking of going the unionfs
> route. IMHO, that's the 'right' way to do it!
I just need to get around to actually finishing a proof-of-concept
implementation! It seems I am always just a little too busy.
I was thinking about the /System/Kernel/Modules thing. Unionfs may be too
slow to do the /System/Links with it. But how about using it for /S/K/M?
That should work for module loading, since it will not be symlinked, but
modules will be removed with their packages. To keep it up to date we'd just
need a Listener rule, such that whenever a program is installed, it checks if
it has a Modules subdirectory and if so, adds it to the bindmount.
Problem: The unionfs would need to be setup before any modules need to be
loaded. Is that possible with a initramfs?
More information about the gobolinux-users