[gobolinux-users] An error(?) in a article

[Viola Zoltán]

OK, be it a unique numbering, but not this 3-digits numbers why "001,002,
003 or 004 or etc",  above all because this 3-digits numbering is far too
much like to the x86's GoboLinux releases!
Be it at least ARM-003, for example!

Zoli

2007/1/29, Lucas C. Villa Real <lucasvr at gobolinux.org>:
>
> On 1/29/07, Viola Zoltán <violazoli at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hm... This is not logic! Do you feel like renumber this to ARM-013 or
> > 013-ARM? This 003 number have much mistook: is like to "normal" x86's
> > GoboLinux 003 !
>
> I think it looks strange to use 013, as one would probably expect to
> see the same set of packages from x86's 013, which is not true.
> There's not even Scripts/Compile inside it, nor GCC, KDE and
> OpenOffice. I think it deserves a unique numbering.
>
> --
> Lucas
> powered by /dev/dsp
> _______________________________________________
> gobolinux-users mailing list
> gobolinux-users at lists.gobolinux.org
> http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users
>



-- 
Honlapom: http://poliverzum.birodalom.net/powi
Fórumom: http://birodalom.net/forum

A #86-os sorszámú hivatalosan bejegyzett GoboLinux felhasználó
The #86 official GoboLinux-user

A GoboLinux felhasználók hivatalos magyar fóruma:
The official forum for the hungarian GoboLinux-users:
http://linux.birodalom.net/smf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.gobolinux.org/pipermail/gobolinux-users/attachments/20070129/53c70f7f/attachment.htm