[gobolinux-users] RootLess on FreeBSD

[Benjamin Bruheim]

No, I need to get the whole install work before I can install
Rootless. It behaves odd and I can't yet point out the flaw with
FreeBSD yet.

On 3/9/07, Benjamin Bruheim <grolgh at gmail.com> wrote:
> Heh, it makes perfect sense. If PATH is not included in the python
> source CheckDependencies.py generates those errors. The shellscripts
> works fine (or should set PATH). Without PATH existing they generate
> those errors since "dependencies_cache" depends on the input of
> $goboUserSetting whatever that is? Not sure quite. But ensuring PATH
> always is set (in .bashrc?) seems right.
>
>
>
> On 3/9/07, marco.cagnoli at oltrelinux.com <marco.cagnoli at oltrelinux.com> wrote:
> > >> > What happens when you run 'basename
> > >> > lib/python2.3/site-packages/GuessLatest.py' from inside your Scripts
> > >> > dir?
> > >>
> > >> [phed at web ~/Programs/Scripts/Current]$ basename
> > >> lib/python2.3/site-packages/GuessLatest.py
> > >> GuessLatest.py
> > >
> > > Strange, maybe the problem is in '*.py'? I don't know.
> >
> > Why is it strange, Lucas?
> > I am experimenting very similar problems with Rootless (in linux) and I
> > have the same result from the basename command.
> > I am investigating the problem and I discovered something very strange:
> >
> > - if I try to compile Scripts (cvs version) with "make all", with a
> > previous version of Rootless installed (my base system is not gobo), I can
> > compile it
> >
> > - if I disable Rootless (I comment the StartRootless line in .bashrc) I
> > obtain following errors from "make all"
> >
> > gobo at mcagnoli-laptop:~/Desktop/Scripts$ make all
> > for f in FindPackage GetAvailable GuessLatest CheckDependencies
> > DescribeProgram; \
> >         do libf=lib/python2.3/site-packages/$f.py; \
> >            rm -f $libf; ln -nfs ../../../bin/$f $libf; \
> >         done
> > cd lib/python2.3/site-packages && \
> >         for f in *.py; \
> >         do python -c "import `basename $f .py`"; \
> >         done
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >   File "<string>", line 1, in ?
> >   File "CheckDependencies.py", line 43, in ?
> >     os.makedirs(global_dependencies_cache_dir)
> >   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/os.py", line 159, in makedirs
> >     mkdir(name, mode)
> > OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/dependencies_cache/'
> > sed -i~ "s/CURRENT_SCRIPTS_VERSION=.*#/CURRENT_SCRIPTS_VERSION="" #/g"
> > bin/CreateRootlessEnvironment
> > rm -f bin/CreateRootlessEnvironment~
> > cd src; make all
> > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/gobo/Desktop/Scripts/src'
> > gcc -O2 -Wall -o SuperUserName SuperUserName.c
> > gcc -O2 -Wall -o IsExecutable IsExecutable.c
> > gcc -O2 -Wall -o usleep usleep.c
> >
> > - after some investigation, I discovered that everything works fine if I
> > manually export PATH containing gobo directories (I needn't all Previous
> > Rootless but only path)
> >
> > PATH=/home/gobo/Rootless/System/Links/Executables:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games:.
> >
> > Any idea?
> >
> > Marco
> >
> > this is the
> > > On 3/8/07, Benjamin Bruheim <grolgh at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > $libf; ln -nfs ../../../bin/$f $libf;  done
> > >> > > cd lib/python2.3/site-packages &&  for f in *.py;  do python -c
> > >> > > "import `basename $f .py`";  done
> > >> > > Syntax error: Bad substitution
> > >> > > Syntax error: Bad substitution
> > >> > > Syntax error: Bad substitution
> > >> >
> > >> > What happens when you run 'basename
> > >> > lib/python2.3/site-packages/GuessLatest.py' from inside your Scripts
> > >> > dir?
> > >>
> > >> [phed at web ~/Programs/Scripts/Current]$ basename
> > >> lib/python2.3/site-packages/GuessLatest.py
> > >> GuessLatest.py
> > >
> > > Strange, maybe the problem is in '*.py'? I don't know.
> > >
> > >> > > gcc -O2 -Wall -o List List.c
> > >> > > List.c:32:27: sys/statfs.h: No such file or directory
> > >> > > List.c:33:24: sys/vfs.h: No such file or directory
> > >> > List.c is very Linux dependent now. I would need access to a BSD
> > >> > account to have it ported, or you can try to do that yourself if you
> > >> > want to. I just don't have the time right now to do that.
> > >>
> > >> Is it required for operation of rootless?
> > >
> > > No, it's just a fancy "ls".
> > >
> > > --
> > > Lucas
> > > powered by /dev/dsp
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gobolinux-users mailing list
> > > gobolinux-users at lists.gobolinux.org
> > > http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gobolinux-users mailing list
> > gobolinux-users at lists.gobolinux.org
> > http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users
> >
>