[gobolinux-users] errors after udev 115 upgrade

[Hisham Muhammad]

On 11/4/07, Hi There <goboster at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hisham Muhammad <hisham.hm <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > On 10/31/07, Hi There <goboster <at> yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Jonas Karlsson <jonka750 <at> student.liu.se> writes:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > 2007/10/29, Hi There <goboster <at> yahoo.com>:
> > > > > Hisham Muhammad <hisham.hm <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > > > >
> > > <snip>
> > > > > > The new Udev recipe shouldn't install any references to the 'console'
> > > > > > group. Did you update your Settings files properly?
> > > > >
> > > > > Which files am I supposed to change? AFAIK, the only thing I was
> prompted
> > > to
> > > > > change were .rules files, and I used the new version for all of those.
> > > > > BTW, those error messages about lookup_group flash by at boot-up as
> well.
> > > > >
> > > > Make sure that no files were left since the old version of Udev.
> > > > Compare /Programs/Udev/115/Resources/Defaults/Settings/udev/rules.d
> > > > with /Programs/Udev/Settings/udev/rules.d and see that you don't have
> > > > any extra files in the latter directory.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for the tip, here are the files I have extra in the second
> directory:
> > > 10-udev.rules
> > > 50-udev.rules
> > > 51-hotplug.rules
> > > 52-hotplugd.rules
> > >
> > > I take it I should delete those?
> >
> > Yes. And make sure the ones you have in
> > /Programs/Udev/Settings/udev/rules.d are exact copies from
> > /Programs/Udev/115/Resources/Defaults/Settings/udev/rules.d.
> >
>
> There was at least one file in /Programs/Udev/Settings/udev/rules.d that had a
> different timestamp than the one
> in /Programs/Udev/115/Resources/Defaults/Settings/udev/rules.d, so I just
> deleted everything in the former, copied all files over from the latter.
>
> I think I'm not getting any error messages about hotpugd now (I should have
> paid closer attention at boot-up), but I still get FAILED next to the 'Mounting
> Filesystems' messages.
>
> Something I noticed in your "Mounting system filesystems..." line in BootUp,
> there are no tmpfs or procfs entries; is that ok? I thought /proc was required?

Proc is already mounted because the BootScripts need to check
/proc/cmdline. The failure you get might be 'mount /proc' failing with
an "already mounted" error code.

> And just to clarify, your "Starting Udev..." entry comes immediately
> after "Mounting system filesystems..." so it is before "Mounting remaining file
> systems..." ?

Yes.

-- Hisham